ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA CV (COMMANDITAIRE VENNOTSCHAP) DALAM LELANG PEKERJAAN KONSTRUKSI

Laras Diastika Putri

Abstract


The CV (Commanditaire Vennotschap) loan agreement is an example of a
nominee agreement. Nominee agreement is one type of innominate agreement or
an anonymous agreement that is not regulated in the Civil Code, the birth of this
agreement in practice is based on the principle of freedom of contract in entering
into agreements and must meet the legal requirements of the agreement as
stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. Government procurement of
goods/services, especially in construction work auctions, the practice of
borrowing the name of the CV agreement is often carried out by business actors,
both in writing and in writing (verbal), so that the loan agreement for the name of
the CV is as if the borrowing party is the holder of the contract. shares, or
directors of a company and others, while the legal action is carried out for the
purposes or interests of other parties. This borrowing of names becomes a
problem when the borrower does not perform as it should, either in default or
against the law. This article aims to analyze the validity of the CV name loan
agreement or CV flag borrowing in the practice of construction auctions and the
legal consequences for the owner of the CV whose company name is borrowed.
The research method used in this research is normative juridical, prescriptive
research type, data collection method literature study and document study, no
rmative qualitative analysis method. The CV name loan agreement is invalid
because it does not meet the legal requirements of the agreement in Article 1320
of the Civil Code, especially on the fourth condition, namely a lawful cause or
cause. The causa in the CV name loan agreement is a false causa, because the
causa that is violated is against the law. There are two legal consequences for the
owner of a CV whose company name is borrowed. The civil legal consequences,
namely, default and unlawful acts and administrative legal consequences, namely
the CV is listed on the black list or blacklist.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asikin, Zainal dan L. Wira Pria Suhartana. Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan. edisi

pertama. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta. 2016.

HS, H Salim. Perkembangan Hukum Kontrak di luar BW. PT. Raja Grafindo

Persada. Jakarta. 2006.

Is, Muhamad Sadi. Hukum Perusahaan Di Indonesia. Edisi 1. Cetakan ke-1.

Kencan. Jakarta. 2016.

J. Satrio. Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian. Buku 1. PT.

Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. 2001.

Jened, Rahmi. Teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Investasi Langsung. Kencana. Jakarta.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Group. Jakarta.

Muljd, Kartini dan Gunawan. Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian. PT. Radja

Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. 2003.

Said, M. Natzir. Hukum Perusahaan di Indonesia I (Perorangan). Alumni.

Bandung. 1987.

Sulistiyandari, Buku Ajar : Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.

Sulastin, Inka Cyntiya dan S. Atalim. “Analisis Mengenai Kedudukan Perjanjian

Nominee Antara Kapirka Wati (WNI) dan Alain Maurice Pons (WNA)

(Contoh Putusan Nomor 3403 K/PDT/2016)”. Jurnal Hukum Adigama.

Volume 2. Nomor 2. Desember 2019.

Saraswati, A. A. Ratih dan I Ketut Westra. “Perjanjian Nominee Berdasarkan

Hukum Positif Indonesia”. Kertha Semaya : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Volume

Nomor 2. Oktober 2018.

Widjaja, Gunawan. “Nominee Shareholders Dalam Perspektif UUPT Baru dan

UU Penanaman Modal Baru Serta Permasalahannya Dalam Praktik”.

Jurnal Hukum dan Pasar Modal. Volume 3. Edisi Nomor 4. Agustus




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2023.9.1.400

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



JURNAL IDEA HUKUM (ISSN Online: 2442-7241 | ISSN Print: 2442-7454) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Indexed by: 

                                                    Crossref logo DOAJ has had a makeover and we hope you like the result! – DOAJ BlogSinta, Scopus ala Indonesia dari Kemenristekdikti – STIE Lhokseumawe